AI Automation
We connect the tools you already use and take the repetitive parts of the process (handoffs, data entry, reporting, follow-up) off your team's plate.
AI AutomationWhat this includes
A few of the things that stop being manual work:
Built with
How the work gets automated
Map the handoffs
Not the steps, the gaps between them, where work waits for somebody to notice it. Anything a person retypes from one screen to another is data two systems already hold.
Collect the exceptions
The supplier who sends invoices as photographs, the order with the quantity in the notes field. Every one of these turns up in the first week.
Decide what fails safely
Which steps can be retried without doing damage, which need a key so a second attempt recognises itself, and where a failure must reach a human.
Build, then watch it run
The gaps only show up under real load. We stay on it while that happens rather than handing over a diagram.
What you get
Work moving between your tools without anyone copying it by hand
Leads and tickets routed the moment they arrive, not at the next check
Failures that land somewhere a person actually looks, with enough context to act
A human kept on anything expensive to reverse
A written list of what we deliberately did not automate, and why
A before and after measure of the thing you were actually unhappy about
Common questions
Which tool do you build on?
Whichever fits the job and what you already pay for. n8n, Make.com, Zapier and Power Automate all do similar work with different tradeoffs around hosting, pricing and how far they stretch. We pick after seeing the workflow, not before.
What happens when a step fails at 2am?
That is a design decision we make up front. Steps that are safe to repeat get retried automatically. Steps that are not get a key so a second attempt recognises itself. Anything unresolved reaches a person, because a failure nobody sees is worse than no automation at all.
Will this replace people on our team?
The work we take off a team is the copying, routing and chasing. Judgment calls stay with people, and we advise keeping a human on anything that is expensive to undo.
Is anything not worth automating?
Plenty. Something that runs four times a year is not worth a system nobody remembers how to maintain. Neither is a process whose rules are still being worked out. We will tell you when that is the case.
How do we know it worked?
We take a baseline while the process is still manual, then measure the same thing after a month of real use, exceptions included. The honest number is the one that includes the week everything went wrong.
Often paired with
Thinking about AI Automation?
Tell us where it hurts and what you've already tried. We'll reply within one business day with a straight answer, not a sales pitch.